Macedon (58) V Lancefield (20)
Progressive score:
MACEDON
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
TOTAL |
|
| Turnovers | 7 |
5 |
8 |
6 |
26 |
| Recoveries | 10 |
13 |
7 |
11 |
41 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 2 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
9 |
| Goals | 14 |
20 |
11 |
13 |
58 |
| Misses | 3 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
Where the game was won or lost?
We had a solid win because the opposition just couldn’t match our skill. Defense was incredible and our attacking routine. We didn’t have to work too hard for goaling opportunity but when it did make its way into our goal ring the goalers shot extremely well and finished off.
Quarters that stood out:
The 2nd quarter stands out because we scored from almost every opportunity given. Madi in WD killed it with 7 recoveries before any of our defenders had a chance to stop the ball. Goaling was shared between Amy and Georgia and 20 shots hit our board.
Significant goal runs:
Q1: we started with singles trailing 3- 2 and then we shot 7 followed by 6.
Q2: We started with the first 6, then the next 7, then 2, then 1 and then the last 4 for the quarter.
Q3: We started with the first 5, then there were 2 singles. Lancefield shot 2, we shot 2, they shot another 2 and then we shot 3. Lancefield finished with the last 2. We lead by 30.
Q4: We shot the first 2, then another 3, then 2 more and then 4 goals before shooting the last for the game.
Positives to be taken from the game:
- Our defensive pressure was extremely strong.
- We quickly adapted to the umpiring.
- Goaling accuracy and volume was excellent.
- Feeding and assists were solid.
Area for improvement:
- Our starts. We were down 3-2 in the early stages of the first quarter.
- WA taking more of the work load in the center passes
- Reducing our bad passes as ALL our turnovers were bad passes.
Goaling Breakdown:
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Total | % | |
| Amy: | 6/7 | 11/2 | 5/6 | 4/7 | 26/32 | 81% |
| Georgia: | 8/10 | 9/10 | 6/7 | 9/9 | 32/36 | 89% |
| Team Goaling | 58/68 | 85% | ||||
| Lancefield | 20/34 | 59% | ||||
VOTES: 3 Madi 2 Georgia 1 Amy